|
|
Post by AnimaStone on Mar 29, 2006 19:13:21 GMT -5
I'm so sad that Chef left. My life is over.
*suddenly realizes that he's talking about South Park in the Harry Potter forum*
Um... so, who else thinks movie 5 will suck?
|
|
Lady Enelya
Tarkaan 
Royal Seeress
shp(o~-8275;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~10,29,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,11;; )
Posts: 2,406
|
Post by Lady Enelya on Mar 30, 2006 3:45:14 GMT -5
Dunno all depends on how they handle certain things.
but movie 4 was not a comforting antecendant.
|
|
|
|
Post by piñata on Mar 30, 2006 12:47:27 GMT -5
No, although it was better than the 3rd movie.  |
|
|
|
Post by AnimaStone on Mar 30, 2006 21:51:18 GMT -5
Better than the third? THOU LIEST!
|
|
Lady Enelya
Tarkaan
Royal Seeress
shp(o~-8275;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~10,29,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,11;; )
Posts: 2,406
|
Post by Lady Enelya on Mar 31, 2006 3:43:53 GMT -5
I agree with you pinata no 3 sucked big monkey testicles!
|
|
|
|
Post by piñata on Mar 31, 2006 12:23:38 GMT -5
Yeah, the only thing worse than the 3rd HP movie was the 2nd LOTR movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnimaStone on Mar 31, 2006 19:54:11 GMT -5
Okay, the second LOTR movie is redeemed in my opinion for Legolas skateboarding on the shield. Other than that, it wasn't that great, but that made it okay.
|
|
|
|
Post by Predator-Fan on Apr 3, 2006 10:49:26 GMT -5
No, although it was better than the 3rd movie. You better believe it! Third on SUCKED! |
|
|
|
Post by AnimaStone on Apr 5, 2006 20:48:25 GMT -5
Hm. It appears that I am the only person ever to like the third movie.
No, seriously. I liked it more than the first two.
|
|
Lady Enelya
Tarkaan
Royal Seeress
shp(o~-8275;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~10,29,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,11;; )
Posts: 2,406
|
Post by Lady Enelya on Apr 6, 2006 6:56:49 GMT -5
2d lotr was better than the 1st!!
|
|
|
|
Post by piñata on Apr 6, 2006 9:09:46 GMT -5
The 1st LOTR was the best one. They didn't change anything. After Boromir's death scene everything in the movies went straight to hell.  |
|
Lady Enelya
Tarkaan
Royal Seeress
shp(o~-8275;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~10,29,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,11;; )
Posts: 2,406
|
Post by Lady Enelya on Apr 6, 2006 9:43:16 GMT -5
hack spit! eh no!
|
|
|
|
Post by AnimaStone on Apr 6, 2006 18:01:13 GMT -5
ARTICLE ONE: Tom Bombadil. (Which was infeasible.)
ARTICLE TWO: Pellenor Fields. Hells yeah.
Actually, I was talking about the HP movies... but whatever floats your boat, I suppose.
|
|
Lady Enelya
Tarkaan
Royal Seeress
shp(o~-8275;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~10,29,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,11;; )
Posts: 2,406
|
Post by Lady Enelya on Apr 7, 2006 3:37:54 GMT -5
that too!
No 1 was oookay! pant in places!
No 2 better!
No 3 HELL YEAH!
No 4 meh take or leave!
|
|
|
|
Post by Predator-Fan on Apr 7, 2006 9:35:53 GMT -5
Hm. It appears that I am the only person ever to like the third movie. No, seriously. I liked it more than the first two. Overruled.......but you gotta remember: Majority rules, minority rights. 3rd movie did not follow the book @ all whereas the 1st and 2nd movie followed the movie completely! Yesterday at 10:09am, piñata wrote: The 1st LOTR was the best one. They didn't change anything. After Boromir's death scene everything in the movies went straight to hell. You better believe that too! 2nd & 3rd lotr: GO TO HELL! |
|
