|
|
Post by Belgarath on Aug 5, 2004 18:27:12 GMT -5
Anyone else think that Belgarath was a tad too harsh on Belzedar in Enchanter's End Game? I mean, it wasn't Belzedar's fault really that he was Torak's servant...Torak just overwhelmed him. Also, he was only acting in self-defense when he killed Durnik, and that had to happen for the Prophecy to be filled...Trapping him in a rock was a tad...harsh IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Silk on Aug 26, 2004 11:52:42 GMT -5
For the sake of those that haven't read the books yet, maybe spoiler warnings would be...nice?
I think he got what he had coming. Granted, thats a cruel way to go, but he is a "Bel" - it's not like he was helpless!
|
|
|
|
Post by Belgarath on Aug 27, 2004 18:04:17 GMT -5
Hahaha, sorry Meggy, but I first thought that pinata had finished the books...  I know he wasn't defenseless, but did Belgarath really have to torture him like that...? |
|
|
|
Post by Silk on Aug 28, 2004 6:29:01 GMT -5
Agreed, I didn't think Belg would have been that cruel, but I'm sure he had his reasons.
Oh...I remember now - wasn't there something about why he couldn't kill him, and he had to stay alive in that rock forever...something like that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Belgarath on Aug 29, 2004 16:08:46 GMT -5
No, Belgarath could have killed him. He put him in the rock for eternity because he knows that he will never be able to get out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Silk on Aug 31, 2004 14:49:12 GMT -5
I know he was able to kill him, but I think there was something upsetting some balance. Or maybe it was just guilt or hatred for stabbing Aldur in the back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Belgarath on Aug 31, 2004 16:30:42 GMT -5
I'm positive it was just revenge for killing Durnik, it says something like that in the book.
|
|
|
|
Post by Silk on Sept 4, 2004 10:53:12 GMT -5
Yea - too bad he's gone <_< >_>
|
|
