|
|
Post by piñata on Aug 25, 2004 9:49:03 GMT -5
I haven't done any of these... there weren't campaign settings yet when the version I play came out... but I've got this poll here in case anyone else wants to weigh in (Eldae, Armadillo, etc.).
|
|
|
|
Post by eldae on Oct 13, 2004 19:40:13 GMT -5
FR's the only one I've played, although DL looks pretty cool... Is there even a ME setting? I thought it was a seperate RPG system.
|
|
|
|
Post by piñata on Oct 14, 2004 11:34:37 GMT -5
I saw a ME-themed D&D book at Waldenbooks once... I'm really not sure how much they've done with it as a campaign setting, though.  |
|
|
|
Post by eldae on Oct 22, 2004 19:41:17 GMT -5
are you sure it was D&D and not a seperate rule system?
|
|
|
|
Post by piñata on Oct 24, 2004 18:14:08 GMT -5
It said D&D on it. I almost bought it, but it was freaking expensive.  |
|
|
|
Post by eldae on Aug 4, 2005 12:02:44 GMT -5
I've developed a kind of hatred for Eberron... simply because every single new game coming out is set in Eberron, when FR or Dragonlance would be so much incredibly cooler. I need to find that ME D&D module thoughl... haven't seen it anywhere, but I'll keep a lookout.
|
|
|
|
Post by piñata on Aug 5, 2005 11:09:36 GMT -5
I only saw it that one time, so I assume it's either rare to begin with or was just about to go out of print when I saw it.  Good luck, though. I'm going to look for one too, because I'd like to get into an updated version of D&D. |
|
|
|
Post by eldae on Aug 16, 2005 13:42:29 GMT -5
If you are ypdating your rules set, I'd advise going with 3rd edition D&D... because 3.5 ticks me off. And, oddly enough, Eberron was the first new campaign setting after 3.5 came out... |
|
|
|
Post by AnimaStone on Aug 16, 2005 18:26:16 GMT -5
Aw... no love for 3.5? Why? That's the system you can get the best Bard twink in.
|
|
|
|
Post by eldae on Aug 17, 2005 11:38:49 GMT -5
well, a lot of the buff spells were weakened, and I can't stand the way they use damage reduction now. I tend to house-rule the paladin, bard, and ranger changes, because they needed a bit of an upgrade, but I also don't like the new "based on size of wielder, the damage changes because they have to use smaller versions". I like my halflings simply using short swords, instead of having a midget sized longsword.
|
|
|
|
Post by piñata on Aug 17, 2005 13:31:50 GMT -5
*exalts Eldae* I'm glad to see I'm not the only old-school player here.  |
|
|
|
Post by AnimaStone on Aug 17, 2005 19:44:55 GMT -5
well, a lot of the buff spells were weakened, and I can't stand the way they use damage reduction now. I tend to house-rule the paladin, bard, and ranger changes, because they needed a bit of an upgrade, but I also don't like the new "based on size of wielder, the damage changes because they have to use smaller versions". I like my halflings simply using short swords, instead of having a midget sized longsword. I would agree if the bard twink didn't own all. All except the Monk twink, of course. |
|
|
|
Post by eldae on Aug 22, 2005 14:34:42 GMT -5
See, that's why I just house rule in most of the class changes. Like I said, my main problem is the fact that I don't like putting more emphasis on material type than magical power as far as weapons. Since I seem to be overly fond of house-ruling everything, I tend to allow the materials to have a certain amount of damage reduction (shown by equivalent magical bonus effectiveness.)
|
|
|
|
Post by AnimaStone on Aug 22, 2005 17:45:22 GMT -5
Wow... I hardly even play D&D (the group basically broke apart), and yet I understand every word you say. Truly, I am the uber-nerd.
|
|
|
|
Post by piñata on Aug 23, 2005 7:24:07 GMT -5
I have trouble finding people to play with here, too. Maybe we should get an online D&D campaign going. |
|
