|
|
Post by AnimaStone on Aug 23, 2005 22:07:27 GMT -5
That would probably work depressingly well. I'll go hide under my rock, kthxbai. Just tell me when the game is.
|
|
|
|
Post by piñata on Aug 24, 2005 7:09:06 GMT -5
We need more than two players first... I'll try to get Eldae and Kait involved. Then one of you guys can DM... I hate DMing.
|
|
|
|
Post by eldae on Aug 26, 2005 8:02:44 GMT -5
I'm in... is it gonig to be with dice (or java based random number generators), or will it be like the D&D RPs on Kait's site?
Also, I'll volunteer to DM... since I am probably the only licensed DM here... and thus begins my search for DM tools to download, especially those that let me make maps!
|
|
|
|
Post by piñata on Aug 26, 2005 9:53:34 GMT -5
Cool, I was hoping I'd get you to DM. I'm not sure we've decided yet whether it's going to be like the RPs on Kait's site or with dice/number generators, because I think we need to discuss that amongst ourselves and come to a mutual agreement.  We also need to decide which edition of the rules we're using, since you favor 3, I favor 1, and Anima favors 3.5.  |
|
|
|
Post by eldae on Aug 26, 2005 11:08:50 GMT -5
Personally, I think that should be up to whoever DMs, since they'll want to be with the rules they are most comfortable with. 3.0 and 3.5 would be easiest for everyone, since I know where you can find the System reference documents for those systems.
If I do end up DMing, I'd prefer 3.0 with an inordinate number of house rules.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnimaStone on Aug 27, 2005 0:48:01 GMT -5
I'm fine with any system. I usually play a mix of 3.0 and 3.5, but I know how AD&D and the original work. I agree with Eldae, though-- 3.0 + house rules is probably easiest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ape on Aug 14, 2007 19:36:24 GMT -5
I wish I played this game! But I've never heard of anyone playing it in my area.  |
|
