|
|
Post by Minorei on Dec 24, 2005 5:33:31 GMT -5
Thought you might like it  Perhaps he'll sacrifice himself in the end... |
|
Lady Enelya
Tarkaan 
Royal Seeress
shp(o~-8275;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~10,29,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,11;; )
Posts: 2,406
|
Post by Lady Enelya on Dec 29, 2005 4:38:36 GMT -5
Something like that is gonna happen, there is more to this than we know, Dumbledore was so assured of snapes alligance and Harry has been wrong about him sooo many times, that there is def more to this.
|
|
|
|
Post by AnimaStone on Dec 29, 2005 12:54:08 GMT -5
Snape is going to live. He's definitely the object of a gambit, with Dumbledore's life being the sacrifice. He'll turn against Voldy at the last possible second... just you watch... and he's gonna live through it, too.
|
|
Lady Enelya
Tarkaan
Royal Seeress
shp(o~-8275;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~10,29,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,11;; )
Posts: 2,406
|
Post by Lady Enelya on Dec 31, 2005 8:32:23 GMT -5
I don;t know I reckon it could be a double bluff! like snape and dumbledore set up the death bit!
Snape took that oath he couldn't get around it! I reckon he and dumbledore were prepared for that eventuality!
|
|
|
|
Post by AnimaStone on Dec 31, 2005 11:58:04 GMT -5
Yeah. That's exactly what I was saying.
|
|
|
|
Post by Predator-Fan on Jan 3, 2006 11:57:59 GMT -5
Yeah. That's exactly what I was saying. I'm gonna have to agree with you there |
|
|
|
Post by Minorei on Jan 3, 2006 12:00:04 GMT -5
I think you're all right that it was planned, Dumbledore probbaly trusted Snape all teh way to the end.
But I think Snape has no intention of turning against Voldemort unless he's 100% certain Voldemort's done for.
|
|
|
|
Post by Predator-Fan on Jan 3, 2006 12:03:35 GMT -5
I think you're all right that it was planned, Dumbledore probbaly trusted Snape all teh way to the end. But I think Snape has no intention of turning against Voldemort unless he's 100% certain Voldemort's done for. Again, I agreeing with you there. Rember in the 1st book, how whenever Voldemort was around and Harry's scar hurt, happened with him and Snape. Shouldn't Harry have told Dumbledore then?  |
|
Lady Enelya
Tarkaan
Royal Seeress
shp(o~-8275;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~10,29,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,11;; )
Posts: 2,406
|
Post by Lady Enelya on Jan 6, 2006 12:27:59 GMT -5
in the first book it was quirrel was inbeside snape, and he had voldie on his bald spot!
|
|
|
|
Post by Predator-Fan on Jan 6, 2006 12:54:18 GMT -5
True.........how long do you think he was bald?*really off the record*
|
|
Lady Enelya
Tarkaan
Royal Seeress
shp(o~-8275;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~10,29,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,11;; )
Posts: 2,406
|
Post by Lady Enelya on Jan 6, 2006 13:13:30 GMT -5
I dunno could have been years they never cleared up, how long it had been since he was in the jungle.
|
|
|
|
Post by Predator-Fan on Jan 9, 2006 11:54:04 GMT -5
Wasn't it in the Farbiddden Forest or something like that?
|
|
Lady Enelya
Tarkaan
Royal Seeress
shp(o~-8275;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~10,29,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,11;; )
Posts: 2,406
|
Post by Lady Enelya on Jan 10, 2006 6:38:04 GMT -5
no it was pre book 1!
Hagrid said Quirrel was never the same since he came back from a trip to (INSERT PLACE HERE), and Dumbeldore says at the end fo the book, as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by piñata on Jan 10, 2006 8:03:16 GMT -5
Yeah, that's right. I forgot about that.
So... who else thinks Snape killed Karkaroff? They said he was "nastily" murdered, which if you ask me probably means Sectumsempra.
|
|
|
|
Post by Predator-Fan on Jan 10, 2006 11:50:31 GMT -5
no it was pre book 1! Hagrid said Quirrel was never the same since he came back from a trip to (INSERT PLACE HERE), and Dumbeldore says at the end fo the book, as well. Thy should have that for sale! |
|
